Loading...
The legality of free and open source software licences: the case of Jacobsen v. Katzer
Fitzgerald, Brian F. Olwan, Rami
Fitzgerald, Brian F.
Olwan, Rami
Citations
Altmetric:
Author
Abstract
In August 2008 one of, if not the most, influential Intellectual Property courts in the USA known as the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit upheld the validity of a free and open source software licence known as the Artistic Licence. The case is significant because up until this point there has been little judicial discussion of the legal operation of this new type of copyright licensing that is sweeping across the world fuelled by the ubiquity of the Internet. The decision in Robert Jacobsen v. Matthew Katzer and Kamind Associates, Inc. 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17161 (Fed. Cir. 2008) issued on 13 August 2008 provides a unique and welcomed insight into the legal operation of free and open source software licences and by analogy Creative Commons styled open content licences. This article analyses the judgment and provides commentary on its reasoning.
Keywords
Free Software, FOSS, FLOSS, Free and Open Source Software, Creative Commons, Open Source, Software Licensing, Open Content, Open Content Licensing, Enforcement, Legality of Free and Open Source Software Licensing, Copyright, Copyleft, Copyright Licensing, Covenant, Condition, Restrictions, Artistic License, Jacobsen v Katzer, Federal Circuit
Date
2011
Type
Book chapter
Journal
Book
Knowledge Policy for the 21st Century: a legal perspective
Volume
Issue
Page Range
Article Number
ACU Department
Collections
Relation URI
DOI
Source URL
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
File Access
Controlled